Loading
Members scrutinised two proposals: reorganising additional learning needs (ALN) provision, and splitting Ysgol Gymraeg Ystalyfera Bro Dur into two schools. They also considered the Youth Work Strategic Plan, attendance and exclusion reports, and corporate performance reports. Scrutiny supported both school proposals and the corporate annual report going to Cabinet, and noted the other items.
The Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting.
• Cllr S. Reynolds - Item 5A and Item 5B. Personal non prejudicial — School governor of Ysgol Gynradd Gymraeg Gwaun Cae Gurwen. • Cllr J Tuck - Item 5A and 5B. Personal non prejudicial — School governor at Ysgol Bae Baglan and Baglan Primary School. • A Amor -Item 4a – Has a son currently attending YGG Rhosafan and Chair of Governors. Item 4b - Has a son currently in Year 11 at Ysgol Gymraeg Bro Dur, and another son attending YGG Rhosafan, which is a feeder school; also Vice-Chair of Governors. Item 5A and Item 5B. A Governor has dispensation to speak and vote. • Cllr D. Whitelock - Item 5A and Item 5B — Personal non prejudicial — Governor in Ysgol Cwm Bombil. • Cllr M Crowley — Item 5A and Item 5B — Personal non prejudicial — Chair of Governors at Tywyn Primary School and Chair of Governors of Awel y Môr Primary School Primary School. • Cllr Nia Jenkins — Item 5A and Item 5B — Personal non prejudicial — Governor at Cwmtawe Community School and Alltwen Primary School. • Cllr S Grounds — Item 5A and Item 5B — Personal non prejudicial — Governor at Ysgol Gymraeg Ystalyfera Bro Dur • Cllr D Thomas — Item 5A and Item 5B — Personal non prejudicial— Governor at Melin Primary School and has a daughter at Ysgol Gynradd Gymraeg Tyle'r Ynn.
The minutes of the meetings held 25/06/2026 and 16/07/2026 were approved as a true and accurate record.
Members considered items from the Cabinet Forward Work Programme.
Members considered the report as circulated within the agenda pack. Rhiannon Crowhurst Head of Support Services and Transformation introduced the report and advised that the proposal was to formally establish Additional Learning Needs provision already built into the build. Approval was sought to begin the first stage of a three-stage consultation process. Consultation would then be undertaken, the results would be brought back, a statutory notice would be issued, any objections would return to Members, and final permission to implement the proposal would be sought when the schools opened in 2027 and 2028. Members asked how Officers could be confident that the two centres would be sufficient if demand continued to rise at the current rate. Officers advised that certainty was not possible, but the provision did not currently exist and would be additional to provision already available across 13 settings. Officers explained that each new school build includes provision to future-proof for future need, but very large units would not be appropriate simply because a new school was being built. Hayley Lervy added that annual forecasting work is undertaken, although movement into the authority affects accuracy, and this is reviewed each year with the Child and Family Support Team to assess capacity. Members raised concerns that the report said valley community impacts were not applicable, while ALN places were not well represented in valley schools. Members felt that if places were to be at Bro Dur rather than Ysgol Ystalyfera there would still be a lack of provision in the western valleys, which would lead to more travel for children with those needs, and asked for a clearer valley’s community impact assessment for ALN provision. Kate Windsor-Brown responded on the wider Welsh-medium ALN strategy. She advised that Cabinet had already approved provision at Trebanos in either May or June and that pupils were already placed there. Members were advised that the Ysgol Ystalyfera provision had also been approved during the summer and would receive those pupils the following year. Officers explained that this covered progression in the north of the authority and that the long-term plan was to mirror this in the south of the authority. Rhosafan currently had no pupils in it, but once that unit opened and children progressed through the years, the strategic plan was to open similar provision at Bro Dur so that there would be Welsh-medium primary and secondary ALN provision in both the north and south of the authority. Members were advised that this would also help reduce transport costs. Members asked about the documented risks, particularly the availability of staff and especially Welsh-speaking ALN staff, and whether this was expected to be a major problem and how it would be mitigated. Officers advised that growing their own workforce was a key part of the approach, with opportunities for current staff to access specialist qualifications and training in preparation. Officers agreed that recruiting Welsh-speaking specialist ALN staff was particularly difficult. Kate Windsor-Brown added that, as part of the annual Welsh in Education Strategic Plan review, an annual audit of staff availability across the authority is undertaken to identify gaps early. Members were advised that the authority also works closely with Welsh Government and the National Centre for Learning Welsh so that English-speaking staff, and staff lacking confidence in Welsh, can develop their language skills and still contribute their expertise in these centres. Members queried the references on page 41 to capital costs being covered by the programme and asked whether the assessment of ongoing costs meant revenue and maintenance, particularly as the children would already be within the system or would enter it through per-pupil funding. Officers highlighted that the report was about the capital element and officers were clear about the cost explaining that both schemes were in band F and the build costs were already included within the Sustainable Communities for Learning grant funding application. She said revenue planning would be developed once there was a clearer picture of pupil numbers, as the provision was unlikely to open on day one with 16 pupils in each setting. She added that this would almost certainly require a further report at the time, led by Hayley Lervy, containing the detailed revenue information. Members asked about the change from English-medium to Welsh-medium at Trebanos and whether that had already taken place. Kate Windsor-Brown confirmed that it had taken effect from September 2026. Members asked Director for Education, Leisure and Lifelong Learning, Andrew Thomas whether any discussions had taken place with the new Welsh Government regarding the Strategic School Improvement Programme-Proposal and whether it would continue in its present form. Andrew Thomas confirmed that discussions had taken place with the relevant Welsh Government department and with officers who had spoken with the new Finance Minister and Minister for Education. He advised that all indications were that there would be no change to the programme or its funding under the Sustainable Communities for Learning programme. Members then asked whether this had been confirmed in writing and where Tywyn Primary School sat within the programme. Andrew Thomas replied that no written confirmation had been received, but equally no indication had been received that policy was changing, and he added that everything was linked to the Government’s supplementary budget. Officers advised that the authority was about halfway through its nine-year programme and that Tywyn formed part of that programme. Members were advised that the programme would be reviewed with Welsh Government within the next six to eight months to consider delivery progress and any schemes that might not be deliverable. The only scheme currently at risk was the new special school because of difficulty identifying suitable land, but they do not presently envisage changes and said members would be informed if that changed. The Chair asked whether the centres would reduce waiting lists and increase provision or simply redistribute pupils already in the system. Andrew Thomas confirmed that the two facilities were in addition to existing facilities and would add to the current range of learning support centres rather than replace any existing provision. He said this was intended to respond to growing demand and future-proof capacity. Following scrutiny, the recommendation was supported to Cabinet.
Members considered the report as circulated within the agenda pack. Rhiannon Crowhurst introduced the report and advised that this was another Strategic Schools Improvement Programme item following the same process as the previous report. Members were advised that the proposal was a positive development arising after a year of discussions with the school. Ysgol Gymraeg Bro Dur currently operates as one school across two campuses, one in the far south and one in the north at Ystalyfera. Officers advised that after around eight years of successful operation under this model, both campuses were now filling up as a result of sustained work to grow demand for Welsh-medium education. The current arrangements were becoming increasingly difficult for the headteacher and leadership team to manage across such distance while maintaining standards. The proposal was to split the school into two schools, with the same pupils, staff and sites, but with two headteachers instead of one. Members were advised that the wording around discontinuing the school was required by the legal code, even though the practical effect would be to create two schools in its place and said this was unusual because the authority more commonly amalgamates schools rather than separating them. Andrew Thomas added that trade union colleagues had been briefed because staff would naturally approach them with concerns once the report entered the public domain. He said the trade unions were comfortable with the proposal and had appreciated the briefing. Local members had also been briefed so that they were able to respond to questions from the community, particularly as the matter had appeared in the press. Members welcomed the report and asked about the projected pupil numbers on page 111, including how these had been calculated and why there was a drop in 2032. Officers advised that while a formula is used for pupil projections generally, projections for secondary school pupils were more accurate because those pupils were already within the primary system. Members were advised that transfer from Year 6 to Year 7 was currently over 100 per cent because some pupils came in from other local authorities, so a transfer rate of at least 100 per cent could more or less be guaranteed. Officers could therefore use the current nursery to Year 6 numbers in feeder schools to project several years ahead. She added that the code only required the next five years to be shown, which was why the figures stopped at 2032. Members then referred to pages 129, 131 and 160, where there were references to no financial changes, while page 160 also referred to opportunities for staff to access more senior leadership positions. Officers explained that there were no direct financial implications at present, but as the schools continued to grow there would likely be more opportunities for staff if additional posts or senior leadership roles were needed. It was explained that the schools would initially operate broadly as they did at present, but over time there would be more scope for opportunities on both sites rather than within one shared structure. Andrew Thomas added that the move was effectively from one senior leadership team to two, creating twice as many opportunities for progression and for bringing in fresh staff. A Member explained that her granddaughter attended Ysgol Ystalyfera and that people were already asking what was happening, with anxiety in the community because not everyone understood the proposal. Members asked whether there would be scope to speak directly to communities or hold meetings to allay fears. Officers agreed that uncertainty often increased anxiety and advised that a consultation document would be issued through the school to every parent, staff member and the governing body, and would also be made available more widely. Formal meetings would be held with the governing body and staff, pupils would be spoken to, and parent meetings would be held on both sites. She said that instead of large meetings, which tend to favour those with the loudest voices, the authority envisaged drop-in sessions over a number of hours so that parents could ask questions face to face or in smaller groups. She added that an email system would also be set up to collect questions and comments for the consultation report. Members understood this to be a positive development and asked how the two new schools would continue to link their curriculum and share provision so that breadth was maintained. Kate Windsor-Brown Transformation Co-Ordinator advised that the staff already knew each other well and had worked together for many years, which placed them in a strong starting position. She said Ysgol Ystalyfera Bro Dur was already highly effective at partnership working because, as the only Welsh-medium secondary school in the authority, it had long needed to work across borders, especially with Welsh-medium secondary schools in Swansea such as Bryntawe and Gŵyr. She referred to the sixth form model, Canolfan Gwenallt, which for around 30 years had also drawn sixth form pupils from Swansea. Members were advised that this model of sharing staff, expertise, good practice, meetings and training days would continue when the two schools separated, and that working in partnership with another Welsh-medium secondary school in the authority would be easier than the existing cross-border arrangements. Officers added that there were also close relationships with primary feeder schools, including Ysgol Gymraeg Dyffryn y Glowyr and the recently established dual-stream Ysgol Cribarth, and that Welsh in Education Strategic Plan officers monitor and support these relationships, including support with finance and partnership meetings involving other local authorities. The Chair then asked about financial stability and sustainability over the next five years and whether there would be any change. Members were advised that financial stability always depended on pupil numbers. Officers explained the authority already had a largely complete picture of the numbers likely to come through, while further intakes from other local authorities and future developments through the South Wales Strategic Outline Plan and a new Welsh in Education Strategic Plan were likely to increase numbers further. Officers explained the figures in the report were probably a worst-case scenario and that these wider strategic plans should strengthen financial stability by increasing pupil numbers and therefore school funding. Following scrutiny, the recommendation was supported to Cabinet.
Members considered the report as circulated within the agenda pack. Officers apologised that the report had been approved by Cabinet the previous day and had only come to scrutiny afterwards. Members were advised that this created poor scrutiny arrangements, but the position had arisen because Welsh Government had unexpectedly decided in March 2026 to introduce a new statutory framework for youth work in Wales and required all local authorities to produce a plan within a very short period, with submission due by 30/09/2026. Rhiannon Crowhurst commended Jason Haeney for working throughout the summer with a wide range of partners to produce the plan. She stressed that this was not the finished document, that it covered five years rather than ten, and that it would be revisited through the year, with annual reporting back to the committee and more opportunity for Members to contribute to it in future. Jason Haeney added that Welsh Government recognised this as a live plan that would be reviewed regularly with partners. Members thanked Jason Haeney and praised the breadth of engagement with different groups and young people. The member asked what positive lessons had emerged that could be applied elsewhere. Jason Haeney replied that the engagement had brought in many different perspectives and helped reshape assumptions. He said one of the main objectives in the plan was youth voice because young people needed to inform service design, and the survey findings had been enlightening. He added that the consultation had not finished. Further consultation had taken place on Monday with around 50 partners in a youth support multi-agency group, and the results still needed to be analysed to understand how those partners viewed current performance and implementation priorities. He said the key lesson was to keep the plan live and central to planning. Members welcomed the report and asked for clarification about the figure of just under 23,000 contacts by the youth service. Members asked what a contact meant and whether it referred to one-to-one support or attendance at a youth club. Jason Haeney advised that the youth service measured both contacts and reach. A contact counted each separate engagement, so one young person attending once counted as one contact, while the same young person attending ten times counted as ten contacts. Reach measured the number of individual young people worked with. He added that the reported figure was affected by a management information system glitch and around 5,000 contacts were missing from the data. The usual annual figure was around 30,000 contacts, and it was definitely more than 30,000 in reality, but from an audit perspective he could only rely on what the database could evidence at that point. A member said the plan as a major leap forward because it covered youth work across the county borough rather than just the local authority youth service. Members raised concern that online surveys and consultation through youth clubs, partners and schools would still miss the young people most in need of engagement, including those who may be doing anti-social activities. Members asked whether there were plans to reintroduce outreach work to engage with those not using existing facilities. Jason Haeney replied that the previous Change Starts With You consultation had received 1,100 responses, while this time over 2,100 responses had been secured by widening the engagement base. He accepted that opportunities would always be missed and that the service was never fully satisfied with the reach achieved, but it would continue to progress and expand its approach. He said the timescale had been very tight because the consultation responses were needed to shape the plan before the deadline, and that had limited how far engagement could go this time. Members asked whether the plan would actually change anything and whether more could be done, particularly given Welsh Government’s tendency to require strategies without providing resources. Jason Haeney confirmed that no additional money had accompanied the strategy. He said the service would therefore need to make the best use of what it had, but the strategy had already changed thinking and practice. He gave the example that partners identified through the process had now been invited into what had previously been mandatory youth service training, including the Connect group and Youth Mental Health First Aid training. He added that this wider workforce development would now take place across the local authority, not just within the youth service. Members were advised that the also said the authority was re-establishing the Youth Providers Network group with the Council for Voluntary Service so that organisations not currently in regular contact could sit round the table and identify needs. The member replied that this created possibilities for more encouragement and support to community councils, voluntary groups and others wishing to establish youth facilities. Officers agreed, but said funding and capacity remained central issues, while many groups mainly needed direction, support and a place to start. Officers added that partnership working could also enable access to funding sources unavailable to the local authority itself, and that Jason Haeney’s team already worked each year with the voluntary sector while looking for opportunities to fill gaps such as funding extra weekly provision. Officers explained that another important development was bringing national organisations to the table to support local groups. They listed the Boys and Girls Club, Youth Cymru, Urydd and said that CWVYS had been approached and had suggested contacting local delivery organisations directly. As a result, Youth Company and other providers had been asked to identify what they were delivering locally and any future plans, so that they could help shape the strategy. Members referred to mental health first aid delivered by voluntary groups and said she had been involved in such work previously. Members linked this to young people in rugby clubs who struggled to discuss their mental health and said external voluntary groups entering clubs could help release these problems. Members referred to two recent suicides of adolescents in her area and said this kind of partnership working with the voluntary sector needed to be explored as a way forward. Following scrutiny the item was noted.
Members considered items from the Scrutiny Forward Work Programme.
Members considered the report as circulated within the agenda pack. Chris Millis Head of Education Development introduced the report and advised that it provided information regarding attendance during the 2025/26 academic year across all schools in Neath Port Talbot. Members welcomed the close monitoring of the attendance gap between children with and without Additional Learning Needs and asked whether there were any common issues emerging from targeted support work when looking into why attendance was dropping off. John Burge Co-Ordinator Child & Family Support advised that there were common issues across schools and across children in general. He said Education Welfare Officers dealt with cases individually, but recurring themes included parental apathy and a lack of parental engagement. He referred to examples where Education Welfare Officers had been spat at on doorsteps or sworn at while trying to intervene and support children. He added that there had also been an increase in mental health issues among children and young people, alongside capacity issues in other agencies outside the local authority whose support was needed to enable regular attendance. He said these were not necessarily new issues, but they were becoming much more prevalent and visible in greater numbers. Chris Millis added that resilience among young people appeared to have changed since returning after Covid, and that the attitude of some parents towards resilience and the expectation of a five-day week had also altered. He further noted that some children with Additional Learning Needs also had health issues which could affect attendance, although mainstream pupils could equally face health-related absence. Members then referred to Appendix A and noted that although the overall movement in attendance figures was relatively small, there was still a wide range between individual schools, with some showing improvement. Members asked whether there were identifiable features in the schools that were improving that could be shared as good practice. Chris Millis confirmed that this work was already taking place. He explained that officers visited schools that consistently featured in the top 10 and assessed their context, including levels of free school meals and Additional Learning Needs, before comparing them with schools in the bottom 10. He said factors included the introduction of dedicated staff to oversee attendance, such as Family Engagement Officers, and a broader offer of support and engagement for families. He added that officers were always looking to share good practice, both within Neath Port Talbot and more widely across Wales, especially with similar schools. John Burge added that the Education Welfare Officer team met regularly, shared problems, used a solution-circle approach, and tested new approaches together. Successful ideas were then rolled out to other schools, while less effective ones were not repeated. Chris Millis added that changes in ranking could be dramatic on paper because very small percentage point differences could move a school several places up or down the table. The Chair asked how Neath Port Talbot compared with neighbouring authorities in attendance terms. Chris Millis said that since Covid it had been difficult to gather directly comparable information, but Welsh Government had published 2023/24 data. He explained that when compared with other challenged authorities facing similar issues around poverty, free school meals and Additional Learning Needs, Neath Port Talbot was within around 0.1 per cent of them. He added that a change of only around 0.3 percentage points could move an authority up or down several positions, and he did not favour direct comparison because local authorities differed significantly. The report was noted for monitoring purposes.
Members considered the report as circulated within the agenda pack. Chris Millis introduced the report and advised that it provided information regarding both fixed-term and permanent exclusions across the majority of schools in Neath Port Talbot. Members asked how current exclusions compared with previous years and whether the number of exclusions was increasing or decreasing. Chris Millis advised that permanent exclusions had fallen significantly over recent years. He stated that in 2022/23 there had been 46 permanent exclusions, followed by 35 the next year, then 19, and 16 in the most recent year. He said this represented a dramatic reduction, which was positive and reflected the hard work taking place, although he stressed that the authority should never have been at 46 or 35 in the first place. He added that fixed-term exclusions had also decreased over the last three years. Officers were now targeting those schools where the decrease had not happened quickly enough. The report was noted for monitoring purposes.
Members considered the performance monitoring items.
Members considered the report as circulated within the agenda pack. Members had no questions on this item. The report was noted for monitoring purposes.
Members considered the report as circulated within the agenda pack. Members referred to the information on page 268 relating to risk and Additional Learning Needs and said that, while the member understood the report’s purpose, she could not access the linked detail because the system stated that she did not have permission. The member observed that the risk description focused on the potential for reputational damage and financial pressures if statutory duties and timescales were not met and asked what about the risk to young people and to their futures if those needs were not met. Members felt the wording did not appear to reflect the full impact. Andrew Thomas Director of Education Leisure and Lifelong Learning replied that the strategic risk system was intended to capture risks to the organisation. He said those risks were the authority’s risks, such as tribunal exposure, awards against the council, reputational damage and financial consequences. However, he agreed that the consequences of not delivering would be even more detrimental in terms of children’s outcomes and life chances. He explained that the strategic risk register was not the vehicle for capturing all individual risks affecting 22,000 children, because those risks would vary widely. He suggested that Head of Service business plans and service reports were more appropriate mechanisms for capturing those wider impacts. Members felt from a scrutiny perspective, they were more concerned with the service impact on children and young people than with the authority’s reputation. Hayley Lervy added that the business plans brought to committee, along with wider reports such as those on the school-based counselling service and other progress reports, were very child-centred and focused on young people. She explained that the strategic risk was recorded in that form because there were still unknowns, especially around post-16 arrangements, some early years work still to be progressed, reliance on partners, and uncertainty over grants for the following year, particularly where statutory posts were grant funded. Members were aware of the funding pressures and the lack of sufficient support despite lobbying and suggested that the committee might wish to consider aligning monitoring reports more closely in future so that the various elements could be reviewed together. Andrew Thomas agreed that this might be something to examine when coordinating the Forward Work Programme, so that strategic risk, business plans and other performance information could be considered in a more joined-up way. Louise McAndrew added that scrutiny members would note that the front end of the report was based around Quarter 1 monitoring and that, over the previous year, an approach had been adopted to bring risk together with performance monitoring in a more holistic way. She said that comments made by the member had been noted previously at Performance and Resources Scrutiny Committee and that the six-monthly update due in December would show a marked difference in presentation. She also referred to the introduction of a performance management system that captured risks and would make them easier to present and access. The member reiterated that risk register material often appeared too sparse for those not involved in it day to day and that a better balance in presentation would be helpful. Following scrutiny, the report was supported to Cabinet.
The Democratic Services officer advised members that there had been a slight change to the agenda because a differently worded report had been anticipated, resulting in two related items being included under agenda items 4A and 4B. Members were updated on the Additional Learning Needs funding report, noting that both this committee and Performance and Resources Scrutiny Committee were interested in it. Officers had been working towards bringing that report slightly earlier to this committee, but factors such as officer capacity had affected progress. The democratic services officer noted earlier comments about performance monitoring items being considered in line with dates when more performance information was being received. A member asked whether the authority was likely to respond to the consultation on mobile phones in schools and, if so, whether scrutiny could see that response or discuss the matter. Andrew Thomas replied that he had not been minded preparing a response. He said he was aware of the consultation but given the volume of consultations issued by Welsh Government and the limited time available, he needed to prioritise issues where he felt the authority could have greater influence. He said his current priority was Additional Learning Needs funding rather than mobile phones. The member replied that she understood that position but felt it would still be useful for Members to understand schools’ approaches to the issue. Andrew Thomas and Chris Millis suggested that this could be explored through the School Standards process, by asking individual schools about their mobile phone policies. Chris Millis also suggested that the Youth Council could be engaged, as young people had very strong views on such matters. Members asked whether there would be any update on preparations in schools for the new qualifications due in 2027. Andrew Thomas and Chris Millis agreed that this was an important issue for the committee. Chris Millis said that officers were still waiting for clarification on the decisions that would determine exactly what would be in front of young people but confirmed that a briefing could be brought forward once more was known. Members asked whether there was any information on reports of a government proposal to ban nativity plays in schools ahead of Christmas. Officers stated that there was no ban on school nativity plays in Wales and that Welsh Government had passed no law or mandate stopping them. He said it remained a matter for individual schools. Members also asked whether corporate strategy and policy documents were still available in hard copy or only online. Louise McAndrew explained that printed copies could be arranged on request, with contact details normally provided on documents for requesting alternative formats. She said printed versions were no longer routinely produced because of costs and the move to online publication but could be provided if required. The member also asked whether any incorrect information in such documents could be referred to the appropriate officer. Louise McAndrew confirmed that issues could be raised, but said officers would need to bear in mind whether any changes would affect content already approved by Cabinet or Council. The forward work programme was noted.
There were none.
Councillors must say when they have a personal link to something being discussed, such as a job, a property or a family member. A prejudicial interest is one strong enough that the councillor usually leaves the room and takes no part.
S. Reynolds: Personal interest on Strategic School Improvement Programme - Reorganisation of ALN Provision
School governor of Ysgol Gynradd Gymraeg Gwaun Cae Gurwen.
S. Reynolds: Personal interest on Strategic School Improvement Programme-Proposal to discontinue Ysgol Gymraeg Ystalyfera Bro Dur in its current configuration and establish two separate Welsh-medium schools in its place on the current sites
School governor of Ysgol Gynradd Gymraeg Gwaun Cae Gurwen.
J Tuck: Personal interest on Strategic School Improvement Programme - Reorganisation of ALN Provision
School governor at Ysgol Bae Baglan and Baglan Primary School.
J Tuck: Personal interest on Strategic School Improvement Programme-Proposal to discontinue Ysgol Gymraeg Ystalyfera Bro Dur in its current configuration and establish two separate Welsh-medium schools in its place on the current sites
School governor at Ysgol Bae Baglan and Baglan Primary School.
A Amor: Interest on Strategic School Improvement Programme - Reorganisation of ALN Provision
Has a son attending YGG Rhosafan. Chair of governors there. The minute notes a governor has dispensation to speak and vote.
Has a son in Year 11 at Ysgol Gymraeg Bro Dur. Has another son at YGG Rhosafan, a feeder school. Vice-chair of governors. The minute notes a governor has dispensation to speak and vote.
D. Whitelock: Personal interest on Strategic School Improvement Programme - Reorganisation of ALN Provision
Governor at Ysgol Cwm Bombil.
D. Whitelock: Personal interest on Strategic School Improvement Programme-Proposal to discontinue Ysgol Gymraeg Ystalyfera Bro Dur in its current configuration and establish two separate Welsh-medium schools in its place on the current sites
Governor at Ysgol Cwm Bombil.
M Crowley: Personal interest on Strategic School Improvement Programme - Reorganisation of ALN Provision
Chair of governors at Tywyn Primary School and at Awel y Môr Primary School.
M Crowley: Personal interest on Strategic School Improvement Programme-Proposal to discontinue Ysgol Gymraeg Ystalyfera Bro Dur in its current configuration and establish two separate Welsh-medium schools in its place on the current sites
Chair of governors at Tywyn Primary School and at Awel y Môr Primary School.
Nia Jenkins: Personal interest on Strategic School Improvement Programme - Reorganisation of ALN Provision
Governor at Cwmtawe Community School and Alltwen Primary School.
Nia Jenkins: Personal interest on Strategic School Improvement Programme-Proposal to discontinue Ysgol Gymraeg Ystalyfera Bro Dur in its current configuration and establish two separate Welsh-medium schools in its place on the current sites
Governor at Cwmtawe Community School and Alltwen Primary School.
S Grounds: Personal interest on Strategic School Improvement Programme - Reorganisation of ALN Provision
Governor at Ysgol Gymraeg Ystalyfera Bro Dur.
S Grounds: Personal interest on Strategic School Improvement Programme-Proposal to discontinue Ysgol Gymraeg Ystalyfera Bro Dur in its current configuration and establish two separate Welsh-medium schools in its place on the current sites
Governor at Ysgol Gymraeg Ystalyfera Bro Dur.
D Thomas: Personal interest on Strategic School Improvement Programme - Reorganisation of ALN Provision
Governor at Melin Primary School. Daughter attends Ysgol Gynradd Gymraeg Tyle'r Ynn.
D Thomas: Personal interest on Strategic School Improvement Programme-Proposal to discontinue Ysgol Gymraeg Ystalyfera Bro Dur in its current configuration and establish two separate Welsh-medium schools in its place on the current sites
Governor at Melin Primary School. Daughter attends Ysgol Gynradd Gymraeg Tyle'r Ynn.
Lists the council's current councillors only. Co-opted members, officers and former councillors aren't shown.