The Performance Scrutiny Committee - People considered reports on pupil attendance and school exclusions in Newport schools for 2024-25. For both items, the minute records that the Committee was content with the report. It asked for safer travel to schools to be considered for its 2026-27 work programme, and asked to see the council's harmful behaviour guidance.
None.
The minutes of the previous meeting held 21st January 2026 were approved as a true and accurate record.
The report was presented by the Cabinet Member for Education and the Education Welfare Service Manager. The committee questioned officers and discussed the content of the report. For a full record of the committees’ questions and comments view the recording on YouTube. Comments and recommendations • The Committee requested that the topic of safer travel to schools be considered when forward work programming for 2026-27 begins. • The Committee were content with the report.
The report was presented by the Head of Education. The committee questioned officers and discussed the content of the report. For a full record of the committees’ questions and comments view the recording on YouTube. Comments and recommendations • The Committee requested sight of the harmful behaviour guidance. • The Committee were content with the report
a) Actions arising The Scrutiny Adviser noted that actions were largely ongoing and outstanding actions had been chased. b) Forward Work Programme The Committee were informed that the next meeting will be held on the 17th of March. c) Outcomes monitoring The Scrutiny Adviser noted that outstanding outcomes had been chased.
Councillors must say when they have a personal link to something being discussed, such as a job, a property or a family member. A prejudicial interest is one strong enough that the councillor usually leaves the room and takes no part.
The minutes record no declarations of interest.
Lists the council's current councillors only. Co-opted members, officers and former councillors aren't shown.