Loading
The decisions as the council's minutes record them. A plain-language summary follows once it has been written.
RESOLVED- That the minutes of the Planning Committee held on 8 March 2023 be approved and signed as a correct record.
RESOLVED: (a) That the Planning Committee be minded to grant conditional planning permission. (b) That the Development and Building Control Manager be authorised to determine the application under delegation.
RESOLVED: (a) That the Planning Committee be minded to grant conditional planning permission, subject to consideration of further comments from Network Rail regarding the proposed soakaway shown on the amended drainage plan. (b) That the Development and Building Control Manager be authorised to determine the application under delegation.
RESOLVED: (a) That the Planning Committee be minded to grant conditional planning permission. (b) That the Development and Building Control Manager be authorised to determine the application under delegation.
RESOLVED: (a) That the Planning Committee be minded to grant approval of the reserved matters for plot 7. (b) That the Development and Building Control Manager be authorised to determine the application under delegation.
RESOLVED: (a) That the Planning Committee be minded to grant conditional advertisement consent. (b) That the Development and Building Control Manager be authorised to determine the application under delegation.
Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Ifor Lloyd and Andrew Wood.
None.
None reported.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED- That the minutes of the Planning Committee held on 8 March 2023 be approved and signed as a correct record.
The minutes of the Planning Committee held on 8 March 2023 were submitted for approval. RESOLVED- That the minutes of the Planning Committee held on 8 March 2023 be approved and signed as a correct record.
Councillors must say when they have a personal link to something being discussed, such as a job, a property or a family member. A prejudicial interest is one strong enough that the councillor usually leaves the room and takes no part.
Declarations are read from the minutes once they are published.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED: (a) That the Planning Committee be minded to grant conditional planning permission. (b) That the Development and Building Control Manager be authorised to determine the application under delegation.
Mr Adam Davies (Applicant) had registered to speak in favour of the application, but following receipt of the addendum, chose not to address the Committee. Further to a site inspection, an addendum to the report was presented, highlighting additional observations from the agent, consultee responses, one further representation and correspondence from three local residents, who continued to outline their previous objections based on the proposal being substantially different to previous permissions, concern about the estate’s roads and issues surrounding construction. In addition, concern was expressed regarding Committee procedure and that they were not notified directly that the application was being presented to the Planning Committee. In response to the procedural concerns, officers advised that there was no statutory requirement for neighbours to be notified directly of when applications were due to be submitted to the Committee. The Committee agenda was published on the Council’s website and officers did not consider that there was any procedural error in respect of the publicity arrangements. However, it was open for the Committee to defer the application in order to allow speakers. Notwithstanding neighbour concerns over the wider development of the estate, officers stated that the planning permission had already been granted for a dwelling and that the current application related solely to the variation of a house type on a single plot. Whilst some Members were supportive of deferring consideration of the application in order to enable objectors to speak at the next meeting, the majority of Members acknowledged that the neighbour representations were summarised within the Committee report and that Planning Committee Protocol made clear the procedural process and that exceptions should not be made. RESOLVED: (a) That the Planning Committee be minded to grant conditional planning permission. (b) That the Development and Building Control Manager be authorised to determine the application under delegation.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED: (a) That the Planning Committee be minded to grant conditional planning permission, subject to consideration of further comments from Network Rail regarding the proposed soakaway shown on the amended drainage plan. (b) That the Development and Building Control Manager be authorised to determine the application under delegation.
Further to a site inspection, an addendum to the report was presented, highlighting additional consultee responses and a material considerations update in respect of affordable housing and other planning obligations. In addition, a late response from Network Rail concerning drainage was reported. As a consequence of the above, a revised recommendation to that within the Committee report was presented. Members welcomed the affordable housing contribution and use of a brownfield site. RESOLVED: (a) That the Planning Committee be minded to grant conditional planning permission, subject to consideration of further comments from Network Rail regarding the proposed soakaway shown on the amended drainage plan. (b) That the Development and Building Control Manager be authorised to determine the application under delegation.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED: (a) That the Planning Committee be minded to grant conditional planning permission. (b) That the Development and Building Control Manager be authorised to determine the application under delegation.
An addendum to the report was presented, indicating that the applicant had confirmed the maximum opening hours of the practice as follows: Monday - Friday: 8.30 am – 5.30 pm Saturday: 9 am – 5 pm In addition, the applicant and agent had confirmed that the practice would have two part-time staff; including the applicant, who was a clinician and the second, who would be the receptionist and dental nurse, both of which would take up two car parking spaces. It was further reported that no further representations had been received. Members were supportive of the application and considered the proposal acceptable in terms of neighbour amenity and highways. RESOLVED: (a) That the Planning Committee be minded to grant conditional planning permission. (b) That the Development and Building Control Manager be authorised to determine the application under delegation.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED: (a) That the Planning Committee be minded to grant approval of the reserved matters for plot 7. (b) That the Development and Building Control Manager be authorised to determine the application under delegation.
An addendum to the report was presented, indicating the receipt of amended plans and landscaping scheme. Members were supportive of the proposal. RESOLVED: (a) That the Planning Committee be minded to grant approval of the reserved matters for plot 7. (b) That the Development and Building Control Manager be authorised to determine the application under delegation.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED: (a) That the Planning Committee be minded to grant conditional advertisement consent. (b) That the Development and Building Control Manager be authorised to determine the application under delegation.
An addendum to the report was presented, highlighting amended plans and proposed landscaping scheme. Members were supportive of the application. RESOLVED: (a) That the Planning Committee be minded to grant conditional advertisement consent. (b) That the Development and Building Control Manager be authorised to determine the application under delegation.
Lists the council's current councillors only. Co-opted members, officers and former councillors aren't shown.