Loading
The decisions as the council's minutes record them. A plain-language summary follows once it has been written.
RESOLVED (1) To note and accept the Ambition Board's end of August 2023 revenue review (Appendix 1 to the report). (2) To note and accept the Ambition Board's reserves update (Appendix 2). (3) Agree on the Ambition Board's revised capital expenditure profile (Appendix 3). REASONS FOR THE DECISION (1) To note a projected underspend of £266,683 against the revenue budget in 2023/24 that was mainly due to the success of the Portfolio Management Office with their application to the regional Shared Prosperity Fund. The final underspend at the end of the financial year would be used to reduce the amount claimed from the North Wales Growth Deal Grant and the earmarked fund. (2) To note a further slippage on the capital programme, with an estimate of £7.13m expenditure in 2023/24 compared with the approved budget of £11.25m for the year. DISCUSSION The need to recognise and appreciate the team's work drawing funding down from the Shared Prosperity Fund (SPF). It was noted, although the current situation was stable that the Board noted the financial challenges that face it in the future, and extremely difficult discussions would have to be discussed over the next few months. It was asked if the better-than-expected interest on balances this year was a significant factor in moving forward. In response, it was explained that the interest was likely to be over £2m this year, however this meant that our borrowing costs would be higher in the future, and the interest would contribute to this.
RESOLVED to accept and approve the Annual Governance Statement. REASONS FOR THE DECISION The Accounts and Audit (Wales) (Amendment) Regulations 2018 set fixed requirements on public bodies that operate partnership management arrangements through formal joint committees. Section 5 requires the Joint Committee to review and approve a statement of internal management. The Annual Governance Statement has been prepared to comply with this requirement. The document had been produced to offer a framework for the Ambition Board's operation. DISCUSSION Referring to the table on page 13 of the English version of the Governance Statement, it was noted that there were two asterisks at the side of the Amber Delivery Confidence Assessment for Holyhead Port, however there was no further explanation regarding this. In response, it was explained that: - · The two asterisks referred to the fact that at the time we were waiting for the Welsh Government to sign the Harbour Revision Order, that was seen by the team as a significant risk outside the control of the project itself. · The Welsh Government had by now signed the Order and therefore the risk had been removed. · The only purpose of the asterisk near the reference to the Gateway 2 PAR Review for the Last Few % Project was to explain the meaning of PAR, however this explanation had not been included in the document either. · These asterisks would be added to the final version of the Statement. It was noted that there were no asterisks opposite the projects in the Welsh version of the Statement, and it was explained that the team would also amend that version and would ensure consistency between both languages.
Apologies were received from: - · Councillor Ian Roberts (Flintshire County Council); · Councillor Jason McLellan (Denbighshire Council) with Councillor Barry Mellor deputising. · Yana Williams (Coleg Cambria). · Professor Edmund Burke (Bangor University) with Professor Paul Spencer deputising. · Ian Bancroft (Wrexham County Borough Council) with David Fitzsimon deputising. · Dafydd Gibbard (Cyngor Gwynedd) with Sioned Williams deputising. · Neal Cockerton (Flintshire County Council) with Andrew Farrow deputising. The Chairman welcomed the deputies to the meeting.
No declarations of personal interest were received.
No urgent matters were raised.
The Chair signed the minutes of the previous meeting, held on 21 July 2023, as a true record.
Councillors must say when they have a personal link to something being discussed, such as a job, a property or a family member. A prejudicial interest is one strong enough that the councillor usually leaves the room and takes no part.
Declarations are read from the minutes once they are published.
Lists the council's current councillors only. Co-opted members, officers and former councillors aren't shown.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED (1) To note and accept the Ambition Board's end of August 2023 revenue review (Appendix 1 to the report). (2) To note and accept the Ambition Board's reserves update (Appendix 2). (3) Agree on the Ambition Board's revised capital expenditure profile (Appendix 3). REASONS FOR THE DECISION (1) To note a projected underspend of £266,683 against the revenue budget in 2023/24 that was mainly due to the success of the Portfolio Management Office with their application to the regional Shared Prosperity Fund. The final underspend at the end of the financial year would be used to reduce the amount claimed from the North Wales Growth Deal Grant and the earmarked fund. (2) To note a further slippage on the capital programme, with an estimate of £7.13m expenditure in 2023/24 compared with the approved budget of £11.25m for the year. DISCUSSION The need to recognise and appreciate the team's work drawing funding down from the Shared Prosperity Fund (SPF). It was noted, although the current situation was stable that the Board noted the financial challenges that face it in the future, and extremely difficult discussions would have to be discussed over the next few months. It was asked if the better-than-expected interest on balances this year was a significant factor in moving forward. In response, it was explained that the interest was likely to be over £2m this year, however this meant that our borrowing costs would be higher in the future, and the interest would contribute to this.
The report was presented by Sian Pugh (Assistant Head of Finance). RESOLVED (1) To note and accept the Ambition Board's end of August 2023 revenue review (Appendix 1 to the report). (2) To note and accept the Ambition Board's reserves update (Appendix 2). (3) Agree on the Ambition Board's revised capital expenditure profile (Appendix 3). REASONS FOR THE DECISION (1) To note a projected underspend of £266,683 against the revenue budget in 2023/24 that was mainly due to the success of the Portfolio Management Office with their application to the regional Shared Prosperity Fund. The final underspend at the end of the financial year would be used to reduce the amount claimed from the North Wales Growth Deal Grant and the earmarked fund. (2) To note a further slippage on the capital programme, with an estimate of £7.13m expenditure in 2023/24 compared with the approved budget of £11.25m for the year. DISCUSSION The need to recognise and appreciate the team's work drawing funding down from the Shared Prosperity Fund (SPF). It was noted, although the current situation was stable that the Board noted the financial challenges that face it in the future, and extremely difficult discussions would have to be discussed over the next few months. It was asked if the better-than-expected interest on balances this year was a significant factor in moving forward. In response, it was explained that the interest was likely to be over £2m this year, however this meant that our borrowing costs would be higher in the future, and the interest would contribute to this.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED to accept and approve the Annual Governance Statement. REASONS FOR THE DECISION The Accounts and Audit (Wales) (Amendment) Regulations 2018 set fixed requirements on public bodies that operate partnership management arrangements through formal joint committees. Section 5 requires the Joint Committee to review and approve a statement of internal management. The Annual Governance Statement has been prepared to comply with this requirement. The document had been produced to offer a framework for the Ambition Board's operation. DISCUSSION Referring to the table on page 13 of the English version of the Governance Statement, it was noted that there were two asterisks at the side of the Amber Delivery Confidence Assessment for Holyhead Port, however there was no further explanation regarding this. In response, it was explained that: - · The two asterisks referred to the fact that at the time we were waiting for the Welsh Government to sign the Harbour Revision Order, that was seen by the team as a significant risk outside the control of the project itself. · The Welsh Government had by now signed the Order and therefore the risk had been removed. · The only purpose of the asterisk near the reference to the Gateway 2 PAR Review for the Last Few % Project was to explain the meaning of PAR, however this explanation had not been included in the document either. · These asterisks would be added to the final version of the Statement. It was noted that there were no asterisks opposite the projects in the Welsh version of the Statement, and it was explained that the team would also amend that version and would ensure consistency between both languages.
As the Chair was experiencing technical difficulties, the meeting was chaired by the Vice-chair, Councillor Mark Pritchard, during the discussion on this item. The report was submitted by Hedd Vaughan-Evans (Head of Operations). RESOLVED to accept and approve the Annual Governance Statement. REASONS FOR THE DECISION The Accounts and Audit (Wales) (Amendment) Regulations 2018 set fixed requirements on public bodies that operate partnership management arrangements through formal joint committees. Section 5 requires the Joint Committee to review and approve a statement of internal management. The Annual Governance Statement has been prepared to comply with this requirement. The document had been produced to offer a framework for the Ambition Board's operation. DISCUSSION Referring to the table on page 13 of the English version of the Governance Statement, it was noted that there were two asterisks at the side of the Amber Delivery Confidence Assessment for Holyhead Port, however there was no further explanation regarding this. In response, it was explained that: - · The two asterisks referred to the fact that at the time we were waiting for the Welsh Government to sign the Harbour Revision Order, that was seen by the team as a significant risk outside the control of the project itself. · The Welsh Government had by now signed the Order and therefore the risk had been removed. · The only purpose of the asterisk near the reference to the Gateway 2 PAR Review for the Last Few % Project was to explain the meaning of PAR, however this explanation had not been included in the document either. · These asterisks would be added to the final version of the Statement. It was noted that there were no asterisks opposite the projects in the Welsh version of the Statement, and it was explained that the team would also amend that version and would ensure consistency between both languages.